Page 11 - European Energy Innovation - Winter 2014
P. 11
Winter 2014 European Energy Innovation 11
BUILDINGS ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Looking for the frontrunnersThe results are presented graphically below, compared to the maximum potential score of 25 (=100%).
Figure 9 – Comparison of scores of the 10 appraised renovation scenarios
EU countries falling behind on25
ra20ising building standards
By th1e5Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE)
Europeans spend on the way for the construction of existing buildings into energy
10 average 90% of their time increasingly energy efficient efficient ones. Historically, deep
in buildings, thus making buildings, through the Energy renovation has never been a
Performance of Buildings political priority.
them a not-to-be-missed Directive and the Energy
subjec5t of both social and political
debates. Most of us are aware Efficiency Directive. In a matter To this end, the Energy Efficiency
of the potential that buildings of years, all new buildings will Directive-EED (2012/27/EU)
have to comply with the nearly is a crucial milestone towards
hold to0improve our lives, but we
seHeoxxopimswltoe.etivtimethre,etshAosueepstEepriUmoa ratuBucnrknuansCibtsozieelewelcsshltteohRdeafgputuellbyslic DeBtrzcnheeoumemrntoasmtarhtekirnaenujseocuetFrrnegrixatddiyynsectropreienlfriqingwoGuirnhbeirrtgiuemcoTihmplahtdnhreweioyenNnebgeterlstesexh.,miesrtlaenndcse Romea4adx,naidisaltrlienMsgseibmnSugpbialtedihnrienSgctaThsht.aeeTlslhUe(rKnMoguSeg)AoahvrefAerargtieclePotential
required to develop long-term
strategies to mobilise investment in
the ibmupildoirntagnscteoEconkfe,irmagspytrhsoiasvvininggs & wideoprfearbfnoeyrnmfeoarnmtscaelirseaqtiuoinreomf Peeonnlteiscr.gieys sthtoecrkesn. oThvaetsioenstoraftneagtiieosnBaaulrebildumiilendaginngst tock
the
brings social, eFcorneowmoicrda-nldooking perTshpuesc, Etiuvreope is facing aCocrsut-ceial ective taopgpivroeaacbhoeosst of confidence to
environmental benefits. As dilemma of how to transform the building owners and others to
such,FEiUgulergeis1la0ti–onMhaaps pilaluvesdtrating rhaungkeisntogcokfoaf pppoorarliyspeedrfroernmoinvgationisntvreastteingrieensovations and to the
Non-Compliant
Corrective Action required
Acceptable
Best Practice
DK CZ RO
UK AT
NL
BE
DE
FR
ES
www.europeanenergyinnovation.eu
58 | Renovation Strategies of Selected EU Countries 2014
BUILDINGS ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Looking for the frontrunnersThe results are presented graphically below, compared to the maximum potential score of 25 (=100%).
Figure 9 – Comparison of scores of the 10 appraised renovation scenarios
EU countries falling behind on25
ra20ising building standards
By th1e5Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE)
Europeans spend on the way for the construction of existing buildings into energy
10 average 90% of their time increasingly energy efficient efficient ones. Historically, deep
in buildings, thus making buildings, through the Energy renovation has never been a
Performance of Buildings political priority.
them a not-to-be-missed Directive and the Energy
subjec5t of both social and political
debates. Most of us are aware Efficiency Directive. In a matter To this end, the Energy Efficiency
of the potential that buildings of years, all new buildings will Directive-EED (2012/27/EU)
have to comply with the nearly is a crucial milestone towards
hold to0improve our lives, but we
seHeoxxopimswltoe.etivtimethre,etshAosueepstEepriUmoa ratuBucnrknuansCibtsozieelewelcsshltteohRdeafgputuellbyslic DeBtrzcnheeoumemrntoasmtarhtekirnaenujseocuetFrrnegrixatddiyynsectropreienlfriqingwoGuirnhbeirrtgiuemcoTihmplahtdnhreweioyenNnebgeterlstesexh.,miesrtlaenndcse Romea4adx,naidisaltrlienMsgseibmnSugpbialtedihnrienSgctaThsht.aeeTlslhUe(rKnMoguSeg)AoahvrefAerargtieclePotential
required to develop long-term
strategies to mobilise investment in
the ibmupildoirntagnscteoEconkfe,irmagspytrhsoiasvvininggs & wideoprfearbfnoeyrnmfeoarnmtscaelirseaqtiuoinreomf Peeonnlteiscr.gieys sthtoecrkesn. oThvaetsioenstoraftneagtiieosnBaaulrebildumiilendaginngst tock
the
brings social, eFcorneowmoicrda-nldooking perTshpuesc, Etiuvreope is facing aCocrsut-ceial ective taopgpivroeaacbhoeosst of confidence to
environmental benefits. As dilemma of how to transform the building owners and others to
such,FEiUgulergeis1la0ti–onMhaaps pilaluvesdtrating rhaungkeisntogcokfoaf pppoorarliyspeedrfroernmoinvgationisntvreastteingrieensovations and to the
Non-Compliant
Corrective Action required
Acceptable
Best Practice
DK CZ RO
UK AT
NL
BE
DE
FR
ES
www.europeanenergyinnovation.eu
58 | Renovation Strategies of Selected EU Countries 2014